Friday, February 11, 2005

A couple days ago I posted a diary about Bush's budget, and Ohio Governor Bob Taft's, and how immoral they were from a Christian perspective.



Today, I heard from Chuck Currie that religious groups representing a number of different faith traditions have come together to speak out against the budget Bush has proposed.


A Faith Reflection on the Federal Budget

As communities of faith, we are grounded in a shared tradition of justice and compassion, and we are called upon to hold ourselves and our communities accountable to the moral standard of our Biblical tradition. We speak out now because we are concerned about our national priorities. The federal budget serves as a fundamental statement of who we are as a nation. The decisions we make about how we generate revenue and spend resources test our commitment to these values. Thus, we hold that the federal budget should be viewed and evaluated through a moral lens: does it uphold values that will strengthen our life together as a nation and as part of the global community?


I won't copy the whole thing here, but I highly recommend reading the whole thing, and spreading the word.



Anyone up to a letter to the editor? Check out the list of endorsing organizations below--might want to ask why our "Christian" president isn't listening to what they have to say about the immoral nature of his proposed budget.

Endorsing organizations

American Baptist Churches USA
American Friends Service Committee
Bread for the World
Call to Renewal
Central Conference of American Rabbis
Church of the Brethren Witness/Washington Office
The Episcopal Church, USA
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
Friends Committee on National Legislation
Jewish Council for Public Affairs
Mennonite Central Committee U.S. Washington Office
National Advocacy Center of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd
National Council of Churches of Christ in the USA
NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Washington Office
Union for Reform Judaism
Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations
United Church of Christ Justice & Witness Ministries
The United Methodist Church - General Board of Church and Society
Women of Reform Judaism

These groups ask that you send a message to Congress, reminding our elected representatives that a budget is a moral document, and that they should consider the effect this budget will have on our nation's poor before voting on it.

Wednesday, February 09, 2005

For anyone who may not know this, for Christians around the world, today is Ash Wednesday, which marks the beginning of the season of Lent. When I was growing up Catholic, Fridays in Lent were a time of creative rationalizing for me. When I was in high school, after cooking up some ham and eggs for breakfast, I would realize, "D'oh! It's Friday! But which is the greater sin--eating meat on Friday, or wasting food?"

So I guess creative rationalizing is the wrong thing to call it. Actually, it was pretty darn predictable. But in those days, being a Good Catholic was important to me, so I tried to fit myself into that mold. It was many years later before I encountered the idea of "Building Your Own Theology" (actually the name of an adult education course at Unitarian Universalist churches). Even in college, I somehow had the notion that matters of faith and belief were black and white. You had two choices, it seemed--accepting what you were taught or rejecting it.

Discovering that there was another way was pretty exciting to me, although I wondered why this hadn't occurred to me before. You can *build* your own theology? Well, why not? We don't need to completely accept or reject what we have been given by our parents, our churches, and our society. We can examine it, carefully, piece by piece. Keep some of the old as building blocks, but discard the pieces that simply won't fit. Or reshape/reinterpret them so that they do fit. I'm not sure the process can ever be considered complete during this lifetime, so I'm always on the lookout for new building material.

Many Christian holidays have early connections to earth-based spirituality celebrations. At Christmas (Hannukah, Solstice) time it is dark and we long for the light. Later in winter, we look forward to the rebirth of spring--the word "Lent" actually comes from the Middle English "lenten", which means spring. I am soooo ready for spring right now, but that won't make it come any faster. Might as well try to do something constructive with that time.

As is often the case, I believe Marcus Borg has some useful food for thought...

This process is at the heart not only of Christianity, but of the other enduring religions of the world. The image of following "the way" is common in Judaism, and "the way" involves a new heart, a new self centered in God. One of the meanings of the word "Islam" is "surrender": to surrender one's life to God by radically centering in God. And Muhammad is reported to have said, "Die before you die." Die spiritually before you die physically, die metaphorically (and really) before you die literally. At the heart of the Buddhist path is "letting go"--the same internal path as dying to an old way of being and being born into a new. According to the Tao te Ching, a foundational text for both Taoism and Zen Buddhism, Lao Tzu said: "If you want to become full, let yourself be empty; if you want to be reborn, let yourself die."

This process of personal spiritual transformation--what we as Christians call being born again, dying and rising with Christ, life in the Spirit--is thus central to the world's religions. To relate this to John's affirmation that Jesus is "the way": the way that Jesus incarnated is a universal way, not an exclusive way. Jesus is the embodiment, the incarnation, of the path of transformation known in the religions that have stood the test of time.

Seeing this commonality between the way of Jesus and the ways of the world's religions is sometimes disconcerting to Christians, given our history of "Jesus is the only way." But the commonality is cause for celebration, not consternation. Not only does it mean, to echo an exclamation in the book of Acts, the Spirit has gone out to Muslims, Buddhists, Jews, Hindus, and so forth, but it also adds credibility to Christianity.27 When the Christian path is seen as utterly unique, it is suspect. But when Jesus is seen as the incarnation of a path universally spoken about elsewhere, the path we see in him has great credibility.

Monday, February 07, 2005

Why do so many Republicans hate Jesus? Or maybe a better question is, why are they consistently able to favor the rich, while doing real, life-threatening harm to the "least of these" and not get publicly, loudly called on it. How is it that *anyone* still frames this as the party of Christian values. Consider these news stories, from the past 24 hours:

Taft plan: Cut taxes, slash aid for poor

Bush Seeks Sweeping Cuts to Curb Deficit

State dismantles aid program for people with chronic health conditions


The state is ending a program that paid for medicines and treatment for homeless and extremely poor Ohioans with chronic health conditions such as heart problems, diabetes or mental illness.

Disability Medical Assistance is a $73 million state effort designed to bridge the gap while people await approval for Medicaid, Social Security or other benefits. Income guidelines mean a single person would have to earn less than $115 a month to qualify.

Gov. Bob Taft warned agencies he'll be cutting many services in the two-year state budget plan he releases Thursday. State lawmakers have until the end of June to pass a budget that fills an anticipated deficit of up to $5 billion.


Combine that piece of news with this from the article about Bush's "sweeping cuts":

President Bush on Monday proposed a $2.5 trillion budget that slashes domestic programs from farm aid to housing grants for the poor, as he sought to curb budget deficits that have soared on his watch.

There *must* be more ethical, humane, and yes, since these men claim it as their faith, *Christian* ways to balance the budget.

Matthew 25 (New International Version)


41“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

44“They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

45“He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’


The "least of these" are getting hit by cuts at the state and the federal level. Who will speak for the poor?

Sunday, January 30, 2005

On Friday, January 21, I wrote, in reaction to Dr. James Dobson's anti-SpongeBob anti-tolerance remarks (that he was somehow in a position to make, and be taken seriously at a black-tie inaugural dinner):

Thinking about all of these things, I didn't feel like laughing any more. I felt like screaming--or weeping. But I also realized that what religious progressives (really all non hate-based religious people) needed to do was to speak, and to write about our values. More than that--and this is the tricky part we really need some help with--we need to find a way to be heard.

Well, today I got to enjoy reading the words of a member of the mainstream media outing himself (*snark*) as a member of the religious left. No, he didn't call himself that per se. I don't imagine there is any name we could all agree on, as we're something of an unruly, free-thinking bunch. But Keith Olbermann, in his remarks on his blog, certainly sounds like "one of us", even if we as a group don't generally apply a label to ourselves. In his most recent entry, Keith Olbermann describes the spam e-mail campaign that Dobson incited against himself and three other journalists. He then reported that Focus on the Family had followed up with a piece by Gary Schneeberger entitled “Influencing Olbermann”. I recommend reading Olbermann's entire blog entry, but wanted to draw special attention to this part:

...Mr. Schneeberger now tries extra-sensory perception.

“…When it comes to lobbying liberal journalists like Olbermann, the sad reality is that getting them to acknowledge - let alone to respond respectfully - to our point of view is the longest of long shots. Theirs is a 24/7 secular world - in most newsrooms, especially those in big cities, about the only time you hear the word ‘God’ is as the first part of somebody’s second-favorite swearword.”

Wow. Talk about creating your own reality.

My newsroom is in Secaucus, New Jersey - population 15,931.

“Focus On Family” headquarters is in Colorado Springs, Colorado - population 360,890.

And not to let the facts get in the way of FOF’s prejudice, but I happen to be a religious man. I believe in God, I pray daily, and if I’ve ever gotten any direct instructions from my maker, they were that I’ll be judged by whether I tried to help other people, or hurt them. Also, that true belief should not be worn like a policeman’s club, nor used like one. And, finally, that I’m in big trouble for helping to introduce funny catchphrases into sportscasting.

The producer of Countdown - Mr. Kordick, you’ve met him here, the guy who goes on vacation and celebrities die - is not only a religious man of the finest kind, but actually sings at Church-related events out in the community. And there are many others on the staff who are similarly spiritual, although, admittedly, none of us is pushy nor self-congratulatory about it.

I might also say that I feel a little disappointed in my workplace. Mr. Schneeberger, who claims to have spent a dozen years in “secular newsrooms,” writes of all of these “God Damns” flying around the ones he knows so well. I honestly think I’ve heard that phrase used at MSNBC once or twice in the last year. I feel short-changed. Where did Schneeberger work, The Sodom and Gomorroh Picayne?
....

More importantly, at some point, some of these people are going to wake up to find that the great secular assault they see on their children was, in fact, a bogeyman created to hide their own bad parenting. If they can’t convince their own kids of the appropriateness of their religion and values, then the religion, the values, or the convincing, must not have been very good. Ask my folks if I was an easy sell - yet most of my tenets turn out to have been their tenets - not my teachers’, not television’s, not the secular world’s.
....
Schneeberger finishes his piece with the hope that I’ll experience the same kind of epiphany he claims to have in 1997. “Let’s pray, if he ever does, that he comes up with the right answer - and not because it may lead to fairer reporting. But because it may lead to a redeemed life.”

Hey, guys, worry about yourselves. You’re spewing hate, while assuming that for some reason, God has chosen you and you alone in all of history to understand the mysteries of existence, when mankind’s existence is filled with ample evidence that nobody yet has been smart enough to discern an answer.

You might try keeping it simpler: did you help others, or hurt them?

I’ll be happy to be judged on the answer to that question, and if it’s a group session, I don’t expect I’ll find many members of “Focus On Family” in the “done ok” line.


Friday, January 28, 2005

I have a blog entry at The Village Gate entitled "Speaking Up for Tolerance" that mentions the SpongeBob flap as well as the PBS program that was censored because it involved a family with two moms who make maple syrup.

When I first read the story, I must have just skimmed it, or maybe the first article I read about the program was not that clear on the matter. Because I somehow had the idea that the episode of "Postcards From Buster" featured a pair of lesbian cartoon rabbits. It doesn't. Apparently, like the cartoon Arthur that this program spun off from, this program includes live-action segments. A real human family that had taped a segment of the show was told that they were somehow too "offensive" to be seen on a show on PBS. Knowing this increases my anger and sadness exponentially.

I shared some thoughts here on the the moral value of teaching the inherent worth and dignity of every person.

One of the seven principles Unitarian Universalist congregations affirm and promote is, "the inherent worth and dignity of every person". I truly believe that is what we should be teaching all children-- even if that does not fit with the "values" of their parents. I truly believe this is a value that needs to be promoted, because it contritbutes to the well-being of society as a whole, and is vital if we have any hope of peaceful existence in a diverse world.

Monday, January 24, 2005

I hate to give any additional attention to the hate-based perversion of Christianity espoused by James Dobson of Focus on the Family, especially now that the SpongeBob flap has become yesterday's news. But, at the same time, while this is fresh in my mind, I wanted to address some issues this raises for religious progressives. For anyone who somehow missed this story, Keith Olbermann did a segment on it on Friday. Click here to read his column about Dobson's remarks and the children's video to which he was referrning. And click here to read the statement given on the Focus on the Family web site as to why James Dobson and his organization are publicly denouncing a children's video designed to promote tolerance.

The other day, I wrote a diary on the Daily Kos entitled Cartoons and tolerance: view from the "religious left". I am not a member of the clergy or in any way a known spokesperson for religious progressives, but I just felt compelled to at least say that James Dobson does not speak for this Christian. And I wanted to revisit the dialog we have from time to time about what we can do to make the message (even the existence) of the religious left more visible to the general public.

As one commenter asked:

What can be done? The religious right seems to be organized and have strategy meetings every 6 weeks or so. Is that something that could be organized with a progressive agenda for the religious left?

Pastordan
, who, among other things, writes the Religion News Roundup on Kos, commented

I'm thinking that somebody needs to get a group together to actively cultivate the religious left message. Maybe we can get it funded by some sympathetic billionaire?

I am aware that there are groups out there such as the Clergy Leadership Network and Faithful America, as well as any number of smaller groups and denominational efforts. I think the UCC is doing a phenomenal job of presenting its open, inclusive Christian vision. (Chuckling as I type this--I just visited the UCC web site to make sure I had the URL right, and found an updated home page, with a picture of the yellow porous one, accompanied by the caption, "SpongeBob - You're Wecome Here"." There is also a news release entitled, SpongeBob receives 'unequivocal welcome' from United Church of Christ.)

But it still seems like a smattering of voices here and there. Of course I do not expect us to speak with one voice. But even with all of our voices combined, I don't think the religious left (and center) even comes close to the level of media presence and public awareness that has been achieved by the religious right. How to begin to address this--your thoughts?

Friday, January 21, 2005

Yesterday we heard about James Dobson and, er, shall we call it Spongegate? No--that would be taking his words far more seriously than they deserve to be. I had a bit of fun myself, speculating on where these right-wing ideas about characters like Tinky Winky and Spongebob might originate. Today I read Keith Olbermann's column, Will Spongebob make you gay? and watched the video that Dobson claimed, as reported in Olbermann's column "had been included in a pro-homosexual video which was to be mailed to thousands of elementary schools to push a tolerance pledge by kids, including tolerance of differences of what Dr. Dobson called "sexual identity.""

If you haven't seen the video yourself (it was shown last night on Countdown), the column has a link where you can view it. Keith Olbermann commented after showing the video, "By the way, not only did I not see any sexual identity in that, I didn't even see very much of SpongeBob either. Although Winnie the Pooh wasn't wearing pants."

As I waited in an insanely long line to buy groceries this evening (we are supposed to get a lot of snow this weekend) I thought about the video, which is a version of the 1979 disco hit "We Are Family", and its message of tolerance, diversity, and the idea that we are all family. I believe in that message--those are my values. Thankfully, I have found a local church, which is a member of the Center for Progressive Christianity, and the people there share those values as well.

And I thought about James Dobson and the distorted, hurtful brand of Christianity that he espouses and preaches. I thought about the fact that he rails against and is prepared to blame those pushing a "tolerance agenda" for the downfall of society as he knows it. But I'm sure he does not see that he bears any responsibility when a gay man dies as a result of a hate crime, or when a gay teen commits suicide. I thought about how distubing it is that this man continues to get airtime, that he would even be called upon to give an address to members of Congress at a black-tie, inaugural event in Washington D.C., and that the name James Dobson is being repeated in news stories this week, again and again, in the same breath as the word "Christian".

Thinking about all of these things, I didn't feel like laughing any more. I felt like screaming--or weeping. But I also realized that what religious progressives (really all non hate-based religious people)needed to do was to speak, and to write about our values. More than that--and this is the tricky part we really need some help with--we need to find a way to be heard.

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Has everyone here heard about BlogPac? I've been seeing the name here and there, but hadn't had a chance to really look into it. Howard Dean recently did a conference call with them. Being a longtime "Deaniac", I took notice. But I didn't really decide I needed to look into this thing until I saw their latest effort:

From There is No Crisis

The Blog Political Action Committee has launched a major online offensive exposing the manufactured Social Security "crisis".

BlogPAC, a collection of Democratic bloggers and blog readers, is joining the battle, with an online media campaign that refers to the attacks against Social Security's solvency as "fraud".

"Fact is, There Is No Crisis," said Markos Moulitsas. "And there is no projected crisis anytime in the near future. Or far future."

"We want to provide tools for citizens to engage in the political process on this critical issue," said Matt Stoller "President Bush's consistently fraudulent claims need to be rebutted by the American people, and that's what's going to happen with thereisnocrisis.com."


Read more about the There Is No Crisis here. Click here for Bob Brigham's diary, BLOGPAC and Social Security: An Open Source Press Release, to learn about the strategy and how you can get involved.

Monday, January 17, 2005

I have a diary on Kos today about Rep. John Conyers and the legacy of MLK. At the end of the diary, I have linked to other King-inspired diaries that were posted this weekend. One of the diaries, A Little Inspiration on Dr. King's Birthday, links to the mug shots of both Dr. King and Rosa Parks, which can be found on The Smoking Gun web site. When a commenter noted, "I don't want to see them like that", storwino, the blogger who wrote the diary responded,

I guess that's my contrary, and negative, nature showing itself and that I find more power in the challenges my heros faced than in the successes they won.

That's why I like these photos. They remind me of the very real dangers and degradations that these heros of mine faced. I want to remember that they are/were real people who walked the earth with dirty feet just as I do.


I also mentioned the comment to my husband, who is not religious in any traditional sense, and has described himself as a member of the Church of the Restful Sabbath. He said, "They probably didn't want to see Jesus on the cross like that either, but now they've got one in every church."

It is sobering though. I am dedicated to working for social justice, but am I willing to be arrested if that is what it comes down to?

Saturday, January 15, 2005

I love this quote. I haven't read it for a while, but I just found it again when I was searching for a sermon I heard Rev. Mark Belletini give at First Unitarian Universalist Church several years ago, entitled Dr. Martin Luther King's Theology. I love it because it is full of hope *and* it speaks of such a radically different kind of mandate than the one Bush claims.

From The Strength to Love, by Martin Luther King...

I am convinced of the reality of a personal God. It is a living reality that has been vindicated in the experiences of every day life. God is a living God, with feeling, will; responsive to deepest yearnings of the human heart. (God is the one who) is able to make a way out of no way, and transform dark yesterdays into bright tomorrows. This is our hope for becoming better human beings. This is our mandate for seeking to make a better world.

I had a nice talk with my priest yesterday. Of course, it's always enjoyable to sit down and have coffee with another person who thinks of The Daily Show as a better way to find out what's really going on in the world than watching "real" news shows. But on a deeper level, he reminded me again of the prophetic hope expressed by people like Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who surely experienced far darker times than what we are experiencing right now in the United States. As did Martin Luther King.

Living *my* life, as a White female who has never suffered the kind of oppression that King or Tutu experienced, I have a hard time imagining that I could ever feel the kind of hope, faith, strength, and compassion that they expressed. But when I look to the examples they set, I realize that I need to set the bar a bit higher for myself and at least *try* to come closer to that ideal.

Thursday, December 30, 2004

I just saw this diary on Daily Kos. It is taking me a while to learn the ins and outs of the place, but one thing I know is that if a diary does not get a bunch of "recommends" pretty quicky, it becomes very hard to find. And I think it's pretty neat, so I'd like it to be seen by more people.


A creation story for evolutionists


Perhaps....

...the beginning, God was no size at all.  Because there was no Space.  And no age at all, because there was no Time.

God just was.

And perhaps God was lonely -- and did something extraordinary.

Perhaps God grew.

And when God grew, Time and Space exploded into being.

Stuff at colossal temperatures shot outwards, clumping into clouds of burning gas and splashes of red hot liquid.  Suddenly God was everywhere, because there was everywhere to be.

And God called Time and Space her Universe.


Click the title link for the rest.

Tuesday, December 28, 2004

On January 1, 2002,  I dutifully dragged my sleepy self out of bed, bundled up, and drove to our local Unity church for a 7 a.m. global meditation for healing. Unity was one of the many stops on my spiritual journey, and it's where I happened to be in the wake of 9/11. Feeling a profound need to help "heal the world" in any way I could, I decided, "It couldn't hurt", therefore I have to give it a shot.

When I came back, I announced to family that I had been out "saving the world before breakfast"--my own takeoff on the Powerpuff Girls' "Saving the world before bedtime" (TM).

Even though I decided long ago that a lot of what people at that church believed was too "woo woo" for me, I still hold to the possibility that meditation and visualization can bring about real change. So this year, once again, I think I will ring in the new year by joining people around the world and meditating on peace. This time, I'll do it from the comfort of my own home, though. ;-)


Anyone else ever do anything like this? I'm trying to find any links about it. Here's what I've found so far:

Join us on the inner planes to call forth the Spirit of Peace to assist humanity in creating worldwide peace.  
Friday,  December 31, 2004 at 11:55 PM through
Saturday, January 1, 2005 at 12:05 AM (Your Time)
http://www.orindaben.com/home/wwmeditationpeace.htm
New Year's Eve World Peace Meditation

December 31 2004, 6:00 am–December 31 2004, 7:00 am
http://www.unityhouston.org/events/21

If nothing else, it can't help but be a good thing if a lot of us take a little time out this weekend to "think peace."

Saturday, December 11, 2004

I've been to the Cobb/LaMarche site plenty of times to check for updates on the recount situation, but just recently I decided to see, "Okay, what does the Green Party stand for?"

Someone at our church meeting a couple weeks ago commented that she'd decided after this election that (paraphrased) supporting the lesser of two evils isn't something she can do any more. So she got online to read the platforms of the different parties, and, based on what she'd read, she was joining the Green Party.

So I did some poking around the site, and found this:

Ten Key Values

There is no authoritative version of the Ten Key Values of the Greens. The Ten Key Values are guiding principles that are adapted and defined to fit each state and local chapter. The version you see here was ratified at a national Green Party convention in Colorado in 2000. Read them over and see how many you agree with.

1. Grassroots Democracy
2. Social Justice and Equal Opportunity
3. Ecological Wisdom
4. Non-Violence
5. Decentralization
6. Community-Based Economics and Economic Justice
7. Feminism and Gender Equity
8. Respect for Diversity
9. Personal and Global Responsibility
10. Future Focus and Sustainability


Wow--I almost wept when I read those.

Yeah, I know...it would never play in the red states.
...or would it?

"Vote Green--it's how Jesus would vote!"

51 Capital March

I haven't posted here as much lately due to a combination of work schedule, the impending holiday season, life (you know, that which happens to you while you're busy making other plans.) Much of my spare time has been devoted to my new blog, Ohio Counts. I figure it makes sense to devote the bulk of my blogging time to this issue in the short term, because this is a time-sensitive issue. If you want to find out more about the voting irregularities in Ohio, the public hearings that have taken place, and the impending recount, I've been updating this web site with all the relevant articles I can find.

There is a big, national event tomorrow, which many of you may not have heard about. So, as a public service announcement:

51 Capital March

On December 12th 2004 at 12 noon, before the steps of your State Capitol and the Federal Capitol, join with us to protest the theft of our votes and our voting rights in the 2004 election.

As citizens, it is our duty to protect those basic rights that insure the survival of our democracy and constitution for present and future generations of Americans.

Egregious infringements of our voting rights occurred in the 2004 election: our voting systems were compromised and our votes violated. The line was crossed: we no longer trust our voting systems.


Click here for more. And, if you're interested, you can find my account of the Jesse Jackson rally in Columbus here and here.

Monday, December 06, 2004

Better late than never--today is St. Nicholas Day. We have some friends who celebrate St. Nicholas Day instead of Christmas, and on Christmas they "give back" by working at a soup kitchen or something. That always struck me as a really neat way to handle the holidays, but there are probably about a dozen or so reasons why that would not work with our families.

But anyway, I'll make with some links now...

How to Celebrate Saint Nicholas Day (from EHow)

Wikipedia page on St. Nicholas (notice his almost complete lack of physical resemblance to Santa Claus)

St. Nicholas Day legends and recipes

Friday, November 26, 2004

Just a reminder from the folks at Adbusters that today is Buy Nothing Day

For 24 hours, millions of people around the world do not participate -- in the doomsday economy, the marketing mind-games, and the frantic consumer-binge that's become our culture. We pause. We make a small choice not to shop. We shrink our footprint and gain some calm. Together we say to Exxon, Nike, Coke and the rest: enough is enough. And we help build this movement to rethink our unsustainable course.

Thursday, November 25, 2004

A 20/20 "Expose" on Matthew Shepard's murder is scheduled to air on ABC tomorrow night, November 26. The web site "Boycott for Matthew" reports

In a press release promoting the show, ABC promised "surprising revelations, including Laramie's underground world of methamphetamine use that may have contributed to the crime and whether or not Shepard knew his killers."

The following is a statement from Matthew's parents about the upcoming program

On November 9, ABC-TV announced their intention to air a report on the hate crime and murder of our son, Matthew. The ABC press release was sensationalistic in nature and its implications have caused many of us to be concerned. As a reputable news magazine show, 20/20 has an obligation to its viewers to present fair and truthful reporting, regardless of the subject matter. Based on the problematic wording of their press release, it appears that 20/20 may have strayed from this policy in the interest of strong ratings. We appreciate everyone’s concern. We will be issuing a more complete statement following 20/20’s broadcast.

ABC News did not return repeated requests for an advance copy of the program.


Here is GLAAD's viewer's guide, explaining some of their concerns and questions about the program. Visit Boycott for Matthew if you are offended by this program and would like to respond.

In my last post, I mentioned the Institute for Servant Leadership. I really recommend checking out the site. I first heard of the idea of Servant Leadership when I read the review of Bennett Sims' book, Why Bush Must Go. I believe this concept of leadership needs more attention and contemplation...

What is Servant Leadership?

Servant Leadership seeks alignment with the primal human view that the cosmos is Ensouled and responds to Love as the abiding Power in all relationships. This perception translates into a contemporary relationship with the earth that sees humanity as in the earth, not on it. Thus humans are Creation' s ensoulment become visible and responsible, making the soul of education in Servant Leadership an education of the Soul.

Servant Leadership functions from trust in Love as the energy to overcome the Fear that distorts leadership into the struggle for domination, vengeance and control.

Repressive power in any system eventuates in violence --from such milder forms as passivity, quitting the company or, in the case of children, running from home --to the fiercer forms of violence as smoldering non-compliance, strikes, mutiny, armed rebellion or the horrors of genocide. In a world become too small for violence, power has no acceptable moral purpose except for empowerment to participate in power --in freedom and dignity.

Where freedom is the context of any form of human organization members at all levels are harnessed to a loftier goal than competitive personal gain. The high purpose in servant-led systems --families, schools, businesses and nations --is the inclusion of all its members in proportional responsibility for decision-making and the success of the system. Organizations so aimed will be enlargers of life for their people.

We believe that there is nothing optional about Servanthood as an approach to life. It represents the way the world must go if humanity is to pass successfully through the sea-change of planetary evolution that marks our time.

Sunday, November 21, 2004

This morning, when I saw a blog comment from someone who had a hard time going to church any more, I realized that I hadn't plugged The Center for Progressive Christianity for a while. I remember how excited I was to discover that there was a Christian organization that was so inclusive and open to questioning. Here are the 8 points that describe progressive Christianity, according to this group. Anyway, I realize that there are probably a lot of people out there who are struggling with churches that don't reflect their values, so this might be a good time to point out their search page.

If you can't find a progressive church in your area, you can try searching for progressive individuals in your area.

I also recommend checking out their links page. Some interesting sites I hadn't heard of before, like the Institute for Servant Leadership. Their annual conference sounds so inviting: Emerging Communities of Hope: Conversations, Community and Transformation. Wish I could make it to Atlanta to hear Marcus Borg on that topic. Borg is so gentle and hopeful--I sure could use some of that about now.

Saturday, November 20, 2004

Regina Sewell penned this imaginary letter from Mother Earth...

Dear children,

Most of you presidents, prime ministers and other leaders have been acting like school playground bullies, beating up countries that you perceive to be smaller and/or weaker in order to get their resources and fighting back to prove how tough you are. I’m sick of your silly squabbles over who has the best resources, the best land, and the best water. I have given you everything you need. There is plenty enough of everything to go around if you would all just share. Your greed is killing me. With your weapons of mass destruction, every military and terrorist attack ends up being an even greater assault on me. And just how do you think you are going to live if you manage to completely destroy me?

I’ve tried to be patient, but I’ve had it up to here with you. Stop this fighting at once and go to your rooms! And don’t even think about taking your game boys, walkmans, cell phones, TV sets or anything to play with while you’re in there. This is serious punishment.

And the rest of you stop smirking. You’re in trouble, too. As a group, you put them in power and have supported their destructive decisions. Many of you have even benefited by the gains of war. At this level, most of you share a portion of the blame. Don’t you dare roll your eyes at me. The damage you have inflicted on me with your silly conflicts is serious. You have probably either forgotten or ignored the impact of your actions or inactions, so I’ve written a list of some of the most blatant recent atrocities to refresh your memory and hopefully stimulate your conscience.


Click here to read the rest